![]() ![]() Such power structure was associated with inequality and exploitation, whereby Cultural Revolution created fresh wounds against the new power structure. The revolution was used as means of socialism, which assisted in creating new power structure best referred to as bureaucratic capitalism (Blecher, 1989). Crisis amongst people led to intra-Party conflicts and struggles, which eventually led to Great Proletarian Cultural Revolution. However, despite achievement in moving from New Democracy to Socialism, there was accumulative impatience amongst people based on their disastrous welfare. At the same time, reorganization of the countryside was followed by abolition of private ownership within industrial estates (Zhou, 1996). The Chinese countryside was collectivized in the mid-1950s, which resulted into communes. It resulted into building of heavy industries within the agricultural sector through collectivization. ![]() This collaboration assisted in the building and development of an industrial base through mobilization of internal resources (Blecher, 1989). ![]() Inclination to socialism was as a result of country’s cooperation with Soviet Union. The Party’s ideological commitment to socialism granted them the concentration of political and economic power, which was applied through forceful interventions. All these were as a result of penetration of the ruling Party within society and based on class alliance and democracy (Scott, 1985). There was need for reinforcing individual entrepreneurship which was measured against public requirements and control. Land reform issue was applied differently in towns and countryside, whereby labour and bureaucratic regulations were enhanced in cities as opposed to the countryside. A good example is undertaking land reforms for purposes of ending feudalism, where land was to be redistributed to landless citizens for equity purposes. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |